Skip to content

[PWGLF] “Multiplicity dependent study of inclusive and identified charged particles” #14562

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
dushmanta97 wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[PWGLF] “Multiplicity dependent study of inclusive and identified charged particles” #14562

dushmanta97 wants to merge 10 commits into from
+972 −0

Conversation

@dushmanta97
Copy link

@dushmanta97 dushmanta97 commented Jan 20, 2026

Multiplicity dependent study of inclusive and identified charged particles such as pion, kaon, proton.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pwglf label Jan 20, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading

O2 linter results: ❌ 6 errors, ⚠️ 10 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title “Multiplicity dependent study of inclusive and identified charged particles” [PWGLF] “Multiplicity dependent study of inclusive and identified charged particles” Jan 20, 2026
@alibuild alibuild mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2026
Closed
@dushmanta97 dushmanta97 requested a review from omvazque as a code owner January 20, 2026 17:33
maciacco
maciacco previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2026
View reviewed changes
@maciacco
Copy link
Collaborator

maciacco commented Jan 21, 2026 •
edited
Loading

@dushmanta97 could you please take into account the following suggestions from the linter checks?

PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:495: Add #include <string> for string [build/include_what_you_use] [4]
PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:655: Add #include <set> for set<> [build/include_what_you_use] [4]

Thanks!

@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

alibuild commented Jan 21, 2026

Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for 29126a0 at 2026-01-21 15:54:

## sw/BUILD/O2Physics-latest/log
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:142:39: error: 'kPiPlus' is not a member of 'o2::constants::physics::Pdg'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:143:39: error: 'kKPlus' is not a member of 'o2::constants::physics::Pdg'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:144:41: error: 'kProton' is not a member of 'o2::constants::physics::Pdg'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:845:45: error: expected '(' before 'particleTracksPrimary'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:845:107: error: expected ')' before ';' token
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:849:45: error: expected '(' before 'particleTracksPrimary'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:849:107: error: expected ')' before ';' token
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:853:47: error: expected '(' before 'particleTracksPrimary'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/14562-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGLF/Tasks/Nuspex/MultiplicityPt.cxx:853:113: error: expected ')' before ';' token
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Full log here.

maciacco
maciacco previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2026
View reviewed changes
@maciacco maciacco enabled auto-merge (squash) January 21, 2026 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@maciacco maciacco maciacco left review comments

@alibuild alibuild Awaiting requested review from alibuild alibuild is a code owner

@skundu692 skundu692 Awaiting requested review from skundu692 skundu692 is a code owner

@mpuccio mpuccio Awaiting requested review from mpuccio mpuccio is a code owner

@fmazzasc fmazzasc Awaiting requested review from fmazzasc fmazzasc is a code owner

@omvazque omvazque Awaiting requested review from omvazque omvazque is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

pwglf

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@dushmanta97 @maciacco @alibuild